First Contact with Europeans and African Americans

Historical Traditions

 

First Contact with Europeans and African Americans

Among Cherokee oral traditions are several accounts describing early encounters with Europeans and African Americans. These stories are relatively recent compared to older myths and do not carry the same symbolic depth. However, they remain valuable for what they reveal about how the Cherokee understood and interpreted unfamiliar peoples.

One widely shared story describes the first meeting between Cherokee communities and Europeans.

At first, the newcomers approached peacefully, attempting to establish friendly relations. The Cherokee, however, were cautious and kept their distance, unwilling to trust strangers whose intentions were unclear.

Eventually, the Europeans tried a different approach.

They left behind a jug of whisky and a dipper near a spring regularly used by the Cherokee. When the Cherokee later discovered it, they tasted the unfamiliar drink. Finding it pleasant, they continued drinking until many became intoxicated.

While they were in this state, the Europeans returned. This time, the atmosphere had changed. The Cherokee welcomed them, and from that point forward, a form of relationship—uneven and complicated—began to develop.

The structure of this story resembles older contact narratives, such as those associated with Henry Hudson, suggesting that it may be a later adaptation shaped by shared storytelling patterns.

The Exchange of Talismans

www.NativeHistory.us

Another tradition offers a symbolic explanation for the differences between cultures.

At the beginning of the world, both the white man and the Cherokee were given gifts. The white man received a sacred stone, known as an ulûñsû′tĭ, while the Cherokee were given a piece of silver.

Neither understood the value of what they had been given.

The white man discarded the stone, while the Cherokee cast aside the silver. Later, each found what the other had thrown away. The white man kept the silver and came to value it greatly, building his society around wealth and trade. The Cherokee recovered the stone and preserved it as a spiritual object.

In this way, the story explains the contrast between material wealth and spiritual power—each culture shaped by what it chose to value.

The Lost Book

During the early 19th century, when Sequoyah introduced the Cherokee writing system, some members of the community resisted the idea.

According to one account, this resistance was explained through another origin story.

In the beginning, the Cherokee—considered the elder people—were given a book, while the white man was given a bow and arrows. Each was instructed to care for their gift.

However, the Cherokee neglected their book. Over time, the white man took it, leaving behind the bow. As a result, literacy and written knowledge came to belong to the white man, while the Cherokee remained tied to hunting and oral tradition.

This story reflects a moment of cultural tension, as new forms of knowledge challenged older ways of life.

A Story of Invention and Loss

A more recent tradition speaks of technological invention.

In this story, an African American man creates a small locomotive as a toy and runs it along a wooden track. A white man observes him, learns how it works, and then kills him to take the invention.

Though clearly shaped by later historical realities, the story expresses a perception of injustice and appropriation. It reflects how new technologies and social inequalities were interpreted within a traditional storytelling framework.


The Iroquois Wars

Beyond these contact traditions, Cherokee history preserves the memory of long and significant conflicts with northern tribes, particularly the Iroquois Confederacy.

These wars were once vividly remembered, though their details have faded over time.

Names and Identities

The two peoples had distinct names for one another. The Iroquois referred to the Cherokee as “cave people,” while the Cherokee called the Iroquois—especially the Seneca—by names meaning “people of the great hills.”

These names reflect both geography and perception, emphasizing the distance and difference between the two groups.

Origins of the Conflict

The Iroquois Confederacy was likely established in the 16th century. As it grew stronger, it expanded outward, conquering or displacing neighboring tribes.

At some point, conflict arose between the Iroquois and the Cherokee.

Each side preserved its own version of events. According to Iroquois tradition, the Cherokee initiated the conflict by attacking a hunting party or violating a peace agreement. Regardless of the cause, the result was a prolonged period of warfare involving multiple tribes.

Warfare Across Distance

The distance between the two regions was considerable, making large-scale battles uncommon. Instead, the conflict took the form of small raids and individual expeditions.

Warriors would travel hundreds of miles to strike against their enemies. These attacks were often followed by swift retaliation, creating a cycle of violence that continued for generations.

Captives were taken on both sides, and neither group gained a decisive advantage. The balance of power remained relatively even.

The Tennessee River Boundary

Over time, a practical boundary emerged.

The Tennessee River came to serve as a dividing line between the two peoples. Lands south of the river were recognized as Cherokee territory, while areas to the north fell under Iroquois influence.

This boundary was later acknowledged by British authorities and remained significant until the time of the American Revolutionary War.

In some accounts, the river also marked a limit of pursuit. A war party that crossed back over the river could not be attacked immediately, even if pursued. This unusual agreement suggests a shared understanding of limits within ongoing conflict.

Cultural Exchange Through War

Even in conflict, cultural influence moved between the two groups.

The Iroquois Buffalo Dance, for example, is said to have originated during an expedition into Cherokee territory. Upon encountering buffalo for the first time, Iroquois warriors were inspired by the animals’ movements and sounds, incorporating them into ceremonial dance.

The Path to Peace

Eventually, both sides grew weary of war.

According to Cherokee tradition, preserved by Stand Watie, the Iroquois initiated peace by sending a delegation south. They proposed not only an end to hostilities but also a broader alliance among tribes.

The Cherokee accepted and extended invitations to other nations. Most agreed, though some—such as the Osage—remained outside the alliance.

A formal peace was later arranged in 1768 with the involvement of Sir William Johnson, helping to stabilize relations between the groups.

The Wampum Belts

One of the most significant elements of this peace was the exchange of wampum belts—symbolic objects used to record agreements and preserve memory.

According to accounts passed down through Sequoyah and later witnesses, an Iroquois delegation carried these belts over great distances to present them to the Cherokee.

The belts represented the message of peace through symbolic imagery. One story describes a spring of cloudy water that gradually became clear over three years—a metaphor for the end of conflict and the restoration of harmony.

The Cherokee accepted the belts, and peace was established.

Preservation and Loss

For generations, these belts were carefully preserved as sacred records. They were eventually carried west during the forced removal of the Cherokee in 1838.

In 1843, they were displayed at a major council near Tahlequah, where their meanings were explained to assembled tribes. Witnesses described not only the belts but also ceremonial pipes and other objects associated with the treaty.

However, these artifacts were likely lost during the American Civil War, when the home of Cherokee leader John Ross was destroyed.


These traditions—whether symbolic, historical, or interpretive—offer insight into how the Cherokee understood their place in a changing world. They reflect not only memory, but also meaning: an effort to explain encounters, conflicts, and transformations that reshaped their society over time.